Nu U Nutrition

Company Profile

Company Name Nu U Nutrition Limited
Registered Address Nu U Nutrition

2 Hawthorn Mews

York

YO32 5RR

Website nuunutrition.com

Audit Results

Audit Type Audit Type
Date of Audit 22/03/2019

Customer Service

Score: 5

  • Only 3 reviews
  • All positive

Accreditations

Score: 0

No known accreditation’s

Environmental Policy

Score: 0

No Environmental policy

Self Standards

Score: 3

Website makes a mention of the quality ingredients and quality of the lab/factory it is produced in.

Publications

Score: 17

3 Studies were randomly selected from the supplement page or blogs/articles section;

Huang, L. L., Coleman, H. R., Kim, J., de Monasterio, F., Wong, W. T., Schleicher, R. L., … & Chew, E. Y. (2008). Oral supplementation of lutein/zeaxanthin and omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in persons aged 60 years or older, with or without AMD. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 49(9), 3864-3869.

  • Old paper – Biased funding –  The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
  • Paper was not addressing the point that was made in the article – Found no significant difference

Vidal, K., Bucheli, P., Gao, Q., Moulin, J., Shen, L. S., Wang, J., … & Benyacoub, J. (2012). Immunomodulatory effects of dietary supplementation with a milk-based wolfberry formulation in healthy elderly: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rejuvenation research, 15(1), 89-97.

  • Good article

O’Leary, F., & Samman, S. (2010). Vitamin B12 in health and disease. nutrients, 2(3), 299-316.

  • Good review – in context with information on website

Summary

Score: 25

Breakdown of Scores
Category Score Comments
Customer Service 5
  • Only 3 reviews
  • All positive
Accreditations 0 No known accreditations found on website
Product Recalls 0 No known product recalls
Environmental Policy 0 No environmental policy
Self Standards 3 Mentions both the quality of ingredients and the laboratory
Publications & Advice 17 Biased funding in 1 study – good quality
Total 25 22/3/19
Further Comments
  • Severely lacking Customer reviews
  • Non – existent Environmental policy
  • Old articles used

Return to audited companies list